Stage 5 of 5 · Produces a review record

Review what changes

The technology changes, and so does your organization. Every part of the Map has a review date, and each review records what you looked at, what changed and what you decided, so you can see why your decisions held or changed.

Begin your organization’s responseRead this stage in the guidebook

What you’ll have

Riverbend Youth & Family · sample

Riverbend Youth & Family · review record

Winter review, 2027

PeriodNovember 2026 to February 2027
Who was thereJames Okafor, Dana Reyes, the working group and two volunteer mentors
EvidenceTwo reporting cycles of drafted grant narratives, a staff check-in, and what the team course found
What changedOur grant system added its own AI drafting feature in January.
What went wrongOne draft carried a young person’s first name. It was caught before signing.
AffirmedGrant narratives: pursue carefully. Answering parents automatically after hours: still refused.
RevisedPolicy 4 now names the grant system’s drafting feature.
What followsThe program director walks the team through the change by March 15. Next review in June.

What comes up for review

CharterThe whole charterMarch 2027
ContextFamily intake mapApril 2027
FormationTeam course findingsAfter each cohort
ToolGrant report drafting assistantMarch 2027
RefusalAnswering parents automatically after hoursNovember 2027

Everything in the Map has a review date. Nothing is shown as a percentage.

How it goes

  1. 1Gather the evidence: how each tool has been used, what formation found, and a fresh Reality Assessment when one is due.
  2. 2Bring the working group and the people who decide together, and note who was there.
  3. 3Name what changed: in the technology, in your circumstances, and anything that went wrong.
  4. 4Affirm or revise each decision, and record why.
  5. 5Assign what follows and set the next review date.